BroadSnark

Subscribe

How I Became an Anarchist

November 27, 2009 By: Mel Category: Anarchism, Work

An anarchist future depends on more people adopting anarchist principles. It occurs to me that learning how individuals became anarchists may be useful.  So here is my story.

I’ve always been a little independent and rebellious, but my teenage years really brought that out. Partially it was my natural reaction to the suffocating socialization we are all subjected to. Partially it was me being pissed that the world turned out to be a lot shittier than I had been led to believe. I started learning real history at this point, particularly Native American history.

I got into a lot of trouble. I ran away frequently. Eventually, I was kicked out of school and out of my house. (Truth be told, I wanted to get kicked out of both. I really hated them.) Luckily for me I had been part of a work experience program in high school and, through them, had been working for a law firm.

I sort of skated into law firm work and was able to pay the bills without too much suffering. At twenty-five, I found myself managing the Florida operations of a litigation support service. I was busy and stressed and not particularly happy, but the money was good.

I started the office from the ground up. When a year had gone by, I called the home office to find out about their raise policy. I was told that, unless there was a promotion, nobody got more than .50 an hour raise. With a promotion, people could get a dollar.

Now the people who worked for me did not get paid what they deserved, not even close. Starting salaries for the organization were pathetic. And these people worked their asses off. They were there late and on weekends (sometimes with their kids). They didn’t get overtime.

After my boss told me what I could offer, I went silent on the phone. Sensing that I wasn’t happy about what she had just told me, she said “remember, if you pay your staff too much, you won’t get a big bonus at the end of the year.”

I got a percentage of the profits, you see, and that was supposed to motivate me somehow. But I knew that I never wanted to be that person, the person who gave other people less than they deserved so that they could get more. And I realized that all businesses operated on that same ‘me first’ principle. I left shortly thereafter to try my luck with nonprofits.

So off I went to California to get my bachelor degree and a nonprofit job. (Nonprofits require a B.A. to sweep the floor.) By that time I had my high school diploma and an A.A. in sociology – night school mostly. It didn’t take long for me to end up in a management position again. I didn’t plan for it or want it. I was trying to juggle college and a full time job, after all. I just had this stupid habit of feeling compelled to get done whatever needed to get done.

But, in the end, the nonprofit work wasn’t much better than the for profit work. We were helping people, but not as many as we should have been. We were government funded. When I calculated the percentage of tax dollars that actually went to direct services, it made me want to cry. Some of the grants went through so many agencies that, by the time each agency shaved their overhead costs off the top, there was virtually nothing left.

And even though the organization I worked for made a good pretense of listening to and caring about staff, much of it was for show. Additional funding we received went straight into raises for my boss and a fat consulting fee for a wealthy board member. Meanwhile, we were short-staffed and asking employees to start paying a portion of their rising health care costs.

Worse than the frustration, overwork, and disillusionment was how being a manager changed my relationship with all the people I worked with. Although I felt like I spent most of my day battling with my boss on behalf of the staff, in the end I was just one of the managers who was making decisions behind their backs – decisions they often did not like, decisions that were sometimes bad. It didn’t matter if I had fought the decision in those meetings. Once it was made I had to stand behind it.

I’ve worked for other nonprofits since that one. And while I have steadfastly avoided any more management positions, I have seen the same dynamic in every place I have worked. Larger nonprofits, especially here in DC, have the added issues of ivy league elitism and grotesque hierarchy (which they are in denial of). Yet somehow they think that they are going to make the world a more democratic, egalitarian, and just place from within an organization that is anything but.

It ain’t gonna happen.

Now I don’t mean to bag on the people that I have worked with. In fact, if the woman who told me that I wouldn’t get a big bonus if I gave my staff too much had been an asshole, my life might have taken a different course. The fact is that most of the people I have worked with aren’t any more evil or selfish than any other people. It was putting power into the hands of a few and pretending that they could actually represent the needs, desires and thoughts of everyone else that made everything go bad.

In short, experiencing the disasters of hierarchy led me to ask if it were possible to live without it. Once I started looking around, I realized that it is possible. In fact, I think it is impossible to live with it.

So that’s pretty much it. Take a fiercely independent person, let them experience the disasters of hierarchy from both perspectives, throw in a bit of anarchist leaning literature and…voila.

Any other anarchists out there want to share their journey or epiphany or slog to anarchism?

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

27 Comments to “How I Became an Anarchist”


  1. A long, difficult journey where I at first jumped from statist to rigid "anarcho-"capitalist, then over a year of drifting away, very slowly, realizing all hierarchy, including "non-aggressive" hierarchy was bad, and anarchism and capitalism broke apart, with me choosing anarchism.

    1
    • The change in my economic view lagged a bit too. I broke up with capitalism, but still haven't committed to an economic model. Might have to drift around on that one for a while.

      2
  2. Thanks for Writing this Mel, I always enjoy reading such stories (like I enjoy reading about deconvertions as well). I might as well take you up on the offer and write something like this myself. Hey, this might even make a good meme ;)

    Until then, I can only offer my philosophical basis

    3
    • I'd love to read your conversion story. Your philosophical basis strikes me as plain intuitive. It is strange that people can't grasp the wisdom that, in ensuring others basic needs, you are also ensuring your own.

      I'm not a buddhist, but there there is a quote I really like that sums up the principle for me.

      "Anything you do for yourself you do for the society at the same time. And anything you do for society you do for yourself also." Thich Nhat Hanh

      4
  3. Legos made me hate other people. I'd always set things up like I wanted them to, and then someone would come along and change it all and it would piss me off. and that's why I'm an anarchist.

    5
  4. 12 years of Catholic school and growing up in Orange County, CA did it to me.

    8
    • You are not the only former Catholic schooler who turned to anarchy. In fact, as much as I despise the Catholic church, I sometimes think they deserve credit for churning out so many subversives.

      I've never been to Orange County, but I grew up in a South Florida suburb and I imagine we would have some similar tales of horror.

      9
  5. You are 110% right. And you are now one of my heroes. Congratulations for having the courage to speak. Questioning everything, including democracy and the law and the establishment is what we should all be doing *if* we were fully rational and not convenience-driven. And, yes, anarchy, not in the sense of planting bombs left and right but in the sense of refuting, questioning, and accepting/rejecting, is rational.

    "Yet somehow they think that they are going to make the world a more democratic, egalitarian, and just place from within an organization that is anything but.
    It ain’t gonna happen."

    I agree. It ain't gonna happen. Beware of the good-doers, especially those who boast about it. Religion, after all, is a nonprofit organization. And you and I know well that it is not a respectful concept.

    10
  6. You are welcome. I *love* (grin) the Catholic Church:

    ” target=”_blank”>” target=”_blank”>Reply

  • Wow. Thanks. You flatter me.

    I think I need to write more about charity. The conservatives and right-libertarian response to government programs for the poor is usually something vague about charity. Having worked in non-profits for a decade, I find that incredibly problematic.

    13
  • “An anarchist future depends on more people adopting anarchist principles”

    Not necessarily. Perhaps we simply need to focus on the things we can change (ourselves) and ignore the rest. We can form our own communities, our own “autonomous zones” right now. I’m looking at New England due to the Free State Project but a determined effort could take root anywhere.

    14
    • This is right, to an extent. We focus on bringing anarchism about via direct action, as you said doing our own thing and hoping to convince by example. But the system works against us and thus we also need mutual aid from others doing the same. We need more co-ops to connect and help each other out in order to combat corporate power. We need more communes to confederate and help each other in order to combat landlord and state power. We need more unions to support each other in strikes and stuggle against capital. All of these require more people adopting anarchist principles.

      So it's both really and you can't have one without the other. You will not have an anarchist future without more people adopting anarchist principles as the current system will crush or corrupt you (as they have already done with the Free State Project) and you will not have an anarchist future either without doing it yourself, as those you ask to do it for you will simply look to their own ends.

      15
      • How do I relate? First a quick Intro.

        35 yr. old male, struggling to survive in the trading pits of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange with Fed controlled interest rates serving as the main cause of my detriment, shared by many within my line of work and everyone else that lives in a Fed influenced (is influenced strong enough a term?) world.

        While attempting to diversify my financial opportunities I discovered a California business, with a patent that I would find useful in my area and pursued a business venture with them that would require a franchise agreement. State approval is first necessary and Illinois cashed two checks, having lost one of them, lost the filing, and then continued to ask for more documentation over the next 7 months, all in the name of my "protection" as described to me. I just received approval to proceed but the time wasted has cost me in many regards.

        I always considered myself Republican because of my fiscal stance even though I grew up with democratic leaning, high school educated, blue collar parents. Having given up hope on the Republican party and their irrational focus, I voted Libertarian in the last election even though I cared little for Barr. I don't like the absolutes of the Libertarian party, nor the fact that they are so strongly religious in thought but they seem like a better party then the Republicans or Democrats at the moment.

        I discovered and enjoyed reading Rand ten years ago, but considered her philosophy an improbable ideal at best and terribly flawed at worst. I started following the Ludwig von Mises Institute recently but find many of the authors there suffer the same fate as Rand, though without her successes. I have just started visiting sites like this here and I guess what I'm really trying to say is…

        The Fed is crushing my first entrepreneurial attempt, the state is delaying my second. What can I learn from, support, and make use of Anarchist principles in my day to day life both economically and in regards to my pursuit of making my life and my family the best for us while living my life by standards that I believe are beneficial to my family as well as my community?

        16
        • Well, I fear any advice I will give you will have to challenge your premises. For example you work in Financial services which as far as I know, in the US especially, are some of the most well paid secotrs. And yet you describe your line of work with the phrase of "struggling to survive". What does this mean, are you in subsistence work? Are you comfortable but without luxuries? What is your social status? Did you get the second position in order to cover your basic costs or just to make more money for luxuries?

          The most basic point I have to challenge is your assumption that a social theory is only good when it will allow you to maintain your *current* lifestyle or one that you consider acceptable. But if you life a luxurious life but still need to find ways to improve it, it should be obvious that luxuries do not bring happiness. At this point, it would serve you much better to reconsider why you work and what's the purpose for increasing your stress in order to make more money.

          But to cut to the chase, Anarchist principles would help you in your life, not by achieving what you think you need to achieve to be happy, but by allowing you to become happy through a different direction, a direction which bases itself on mutual aid and direct action. Perhaps the solution to your problems is not to get rid of the Fed (and except the rest of the financial system to remain intact) but to get a career change in order to get into a position where you do not have to suffer under the authority of anyone, either the fed or economic forces.

          17
          • dbo,

            A challenge of my premises is exactly what I'm seeking but I would like to clarify a few things.

            When I say I'm struggling, I mean it. The failure rate amoung traders and brokers on exchanges far outnumber the succesees and fewer still are those successful guys making millions that get the media attention that is common. Still, I was attracted by the energy of the floor and it was my choice to attempt to make a living on the floor.

            Every month is a struggle to meet expenses, costs are rising, insurance for every employee for example, yet revenue is difficult at best. I'm currently taking home less then I made working in high school to keep things going. Almost everyone on the floor is currently experiencing the same thing. The new business venture I brought up is unrelated to finance but if I can get it going, I will be able to save a few jobs that I can no longer support right now.

            We own a small home in a nice but average Chicago suburb, share one car, use public transportation, and often use bikes to get around the neighborhood. We are materially conservative and we lived this way even while I experienced a certain amount of success. Yeah, but so what.

            My point is governement is in the way. They affect me negatively, and I can see the choices they are making are hurting both this country and the world as a whole. This is not working , and yet more and more people are calling for more government action which will multiply our problems further. I don't see capitalism as being the source of the problem; where true capitalism exists. One problem is government conspiring with corporations to direct control of resources and consumption. Calling this capitalism is like calling pre-prepared frozen microwave dinners a home cooked meal.

            Run a household, like the government is running things and the integrity and existence of the family would be compromised at best. The government is promoting the exact same consumer behavior that they blamed Wall Street for, with both greater enthusiasm and a greater debt burden. Fixing a collapsed bubble with a more volatile hot air balloon is not the answer.

            In your last paragraph you suggest I take a direction that bases itself on mutual aid and direct action. I do that now on the trading floor. My job aids businesses in offsetting financial risk while providing speculative opportunities to those that assume the risk. Does this not fulfill your stated principle? The failure I mentioned, is artificial rates and buy signals from the Fed that manipulate the market.

            Escaping economic forces is not a possibility in reality even if I take the extreme action of dropping off the grid and living the life of a hermit

            Thanks for the response.

            18
  • That's a fascinating story. Thanks for sharing it. As someone who came to anarchism via endless frustration with the indignities and irrationalities of being a wage-laborer, it is interesting to know that people can be "converted" from management. I've thought that discussing anarchism with management types was futile since, even if they are sympathetic on an intellectual level, they've just got too much personally at stake to really embrace the ideas fully. Thanks to your article I'll be re-evaluating that notion.

    20
    • You are quite welcome. Thanks for commenting.

      It's true that managers have a lot at stake financially. And if they are very invested in socially accepted meanings of success, walking away from privilege will be hard. But managers lose a lot in the way of personal relationships. They are also often being eaten at by constant ethical dilemmas and the energy it takes to justify their privilege.

      21
  • Awesome. Great blog altogether. I liked this entry so much, I recounted my own development into an anarchist.

    22
  • Please don't drop off the grid. We need you! :)

    I can't speak to your practical situation, since I don't know much about finance, but it sounds like you'd be most sympathetic to the ideas of the "market anarchists", mutualists, and individualists. The most sophisticated proponents of these ideas today are Kevin Carson, Crispin Sartwell and Roderick Long. All have websites. Carson in particular has an evolved critique of how the state and corporations conspire to direct control of economic activity.

    As for what to do…well, there's a burgeoning economic movement toward what's called the Solidarity Economy that's essentially anarchist in character. Many people are working on many different "sectors" of the Solidarity Economy including finance and credit, trying to free up credit from state-corporate controls so that working people and small-producers can maneuver. (one such project that I find very interesting is the Common Good Banks)

    The important thing is that the SE movement recognizes that the main task for people that want to live free and prosperous is that we have to create an economy that works for us and is under our control instead of badgering the State into managing the current economy effectively through our existing political institutions. Getting the State to do the right economic thing, whether you think that's deregulate or regulate more, is a waste of energy. The State exists to do the "wrong" economic thing by most people, i.e. protect the privilege of the wealthy few at the expense of the many. Whether it does that under the umbrella of popular calls for more gov't action is kind of irrelevant. They'll take whatever rationale is most politically expedient, whether it's liberal paternalism or conservative minimalism.

    So, I'd say get involved with that if you can. The movement needs smart folks who understand the money game and over time you'll find other people working on solutions that are consonant with your values. Feel free to email me for links.

    24
  • My answer to your question had to go in a bit more detail to explain. You'll find it on my blog.

    25
  • My answer to your question had to go in a bit more detail to explain. You'll find it on my blog.

    26
  • Josh,

    Thanks for the direction. I'll read what these guys have to say and comment on what I take from them. Talk to you soon.

    27

  • 2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. How I ended up calling myself an Anarchist | A Division by Zer0 02 12 09
    2. If you cannot see how Anarchism can help you, then you might just be part of the problem. | A Division by Zer0 07 12 09

    Leave a Reply

    Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree